Memória P&D Design

15º Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design

UFAM — Manaus (AM)

Outubro/2024

Análise Ergonômica Física no Desenvolvimento de Produto para Tecnologia Assistiva: Uma Revisão Sistemática

Physical Ergonomic Analysis in Assistive Technology Product Development: A Systematic Review

Clariana Fisher Brendler
Eduardo Cardoso
Francielle Miranda da Silva

Como citar

Brendler, Clariana Fisher; Cardoso, Eduardo; Miranda da Silva, Francielle; "Análise Ergonômica Física no Desenvolvimento de Produto para Tecnologia Assistiva: Uma Revisão Sistemática", p. 3929-3944. PPG Design Caderno Científico, Manaus, 2024. Anais do XV Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design – P&D Design Manaus., DOI https://doi.org/10.29327/5457226.1-359

Resumo

Este artigo visa identificar, de forma sistemática, a literatura sobre a aplicação da análise ergonômica física em projetos de produtos para pessoas com deficiência, destacando práticas predominantes, lacunas e tendências emergentes. A pesquisa, conduzida em bases de dados eletrônicas, abrange artigos científicos sobre ergonomia física e tecnologia assistiva. Ferramentas digitais, como softwares de análise postural e simulações, prevalecem na literatura. A colaboração interdisciplinar entre designers, engenheiros e especialistas em ergonomia é essencial para o desenvolvimento de produtos eficazes. Este estudo busca entender a integração da ergonomia física no design de produtos, avaliar sua eficácia e impacto na usabilidade e conforto dos usuários, e sugerir direções para pesquisas futuras. Os resultados indicam que a integração entre captura de movimentos e o Modelo Humano Digital (MHD) é promissora, pois a antropometria do usuário e a precisão dos movimentos são cruciais para atender às suas necessidades.
Palavras-chave:

tecnologia assistiva, análise ergonômica, revisão sistemática

Abstract

This article aims to systematically identify the literature on the application of physical ergonomic analysis in product design for people with disabilities, highlighting predominant practices, gaps, and emerging trends. The research, conducted in electronic databases, covers scientific articles on physical ergonomics and assistive technology. Digital tools such as postural analysis software and simulations prevail in the literature. Interdisciplinary collaboration among designers, engineers, and ergonomics specialists is essential for developing effective products. This study seeks to understand the integration of physical ergonomics in product design, evaluate its effectiveness and impact on user comfort and usability, and suggest directions for future research. The results indicate that integrati

Referências bibliográficas

  • DAMGRAVE, R. G. J.; LUTTERS, D. The drift of the xsens moven motion capturing suit during common movements in a working environment. In: PROCEEDINGS OF CIRP DESIGN CONFERENCE, 2009, Cranfield, United Kingdom. Cranfield: Cranfield University Press, 2009. p. 277-292.

  • DE LOOZE, M. P.; BOSCH, T.; KRAUSE, F.; STADLER, K. S.; O'SULLIVAN, L. W. (2015). Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics, 59(5), 671–681. (https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1081988)

  • EGGER, M.; SMITH, G. D.; ALTMAN, D. G. (Eds.). Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. 2. ed. London: BMJ Books, 2008.

  • GAILEY, R. et al. The amputee mobility predictor: An instrument to assess determinants of the lower-limb amputee's ability to ambulate. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, v. 89, n. 5, p. 613-627, May 2008.

  • IWARSSON, S.; STÅHL, A. Accessibility, usability and universal design—positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships. Disability and Rehabilitation, v. 25, n. 2, p. 57-66, 2003.

  • KARWOWSKI, W. International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2006.

  • KERMAVNAR, T.; SHANNON, A.; O'SULLIVAN, L. W. The application of additive manufacturing / 3D printing in ergonomic aspects of product design: A systematic review. Applied Ergonomics, v. 97, 103528, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103528.

  • LAME, G. Systematic Literature Reviews: An Introduction. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN (ICED19), 22., 2019, Delft. Proceedings... Delft: [s.n.], 2019. DOI: 10.1017/dsi.2019.169.

  • LEE, B.; JUNG, K.; JEONG, J.; KIM, J.; HONG, W.; PARK, S.; YOU, H. (2015). Ergonomic Evaluation of Console Chairs for a Weapon Locating Radar. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 59(1), 1409-1413. (https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591306)

  • LONG, J. (2011). Users of assistive technology also require assistance with ergonomics. Work, 39(1), 79-84.

  • MALLETT, R.; HAGEN-ZANKER, J.; SLATER, R.; & DUVENDACK, M. (2012). The benefits and challenges of using systematic reviews in international development research. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 4(3), 445–455. (https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2012.711342)

  • METHLEY, A. M.; CAMPBELL, S.; CHEW-GRAHAM, C.; MCNALLY, R.; CHERAGHI-SOHI, S. (2014). PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC health services research, 14(1), 1-10.

  • PIKAAR, R. N.; KONINGSVELD, E. A. P.; SETTELS, P. J. M. Meeting Diversity in Ergonomics. Oxford: Elsevier, 2007.

  • PRISMA. Welcome to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. (PRISMA) website. (https://prisma-statement.org/)

  • PULLIN, G. Design Meets Disability. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2011.

  • RANIT ELDAR, D.; FISHER-GEWIRTZMAN, D. Ergonomic design visualization mapping: developing an assistive model for design activities. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, v. 74, 102859, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2019.102859.

  • RUBIN, J.; CHISNELL, D. Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests. (2008). John Wiley & Sons, Second Editon, 2011.

  • SAGOT, J.-C.; GOUIN, V.; GOMES, S. Ergonomics in product design: safety factor. Safety Science, v. 41, p. 137–154, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00038-3.

  • SHINOHARA, K.; WOBBROCK, K. In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 705–714. (https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979044)

  • SHORE, L.; POWER, V.; HARTIGAN, B.; SCHÜLEIN, S.; GRAF, E.; de EYTO, A.; O'SULLIVAN, L. Exoscore: A Design Tool to Evaluate Factors Associated With Technology Acceptance of Soft Lower Limb Exosuits by Older Adults. Hum Factors. 2020 May;62(3):391-410. doi: 10.1177/0018720819868122. Epub 2019 Aug 16. PMID: 31419179.

  • SILVA, J. C. P. da; PASCHOARELLI, L. C. (Orgs.). A evolução histórica da ergonomia no mundo e seus pioneiros. São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica, 2010.

  • SMITH, R. O. Wheelchair selection and configuration. New York: Demos Medical Publishing, 2015.

  • STUCKI, G.; SMOLEN, J. S. The role of physical therapy in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology, v. 25, n. 1, p. 18-21, 1998.

  • TRANFIELD, D.; DENYER, D.; SMART, P. Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, v. 14, n. 3, p. 207–222, 2003. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375.

  • XAVIER MACEDO DE AZEVEDO, F.; HEIMGÄRTNER, R.; NEBE, K. Development of a metric to evaluate the ergonomic principles of assistive systems, based on the DIN 92419. Ergonomics, v. 66, n. 6, p. 821-848, June 2023. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2022.212792