Memória P&D Design

13º Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design

Univille — Joinville (SC)

Novembro/2018

Metodologia para Avaliação de Experiência do Usuário em Periódicos Científicos

Methodology for Evaluating User Experience in Scientific Journals

Jaire Ederson Passos
Tânia Luisa Koltermann Silva

Como citar

Passos, Jaire Ederson; Silva, Tânia Luisa Koltermann; "Metodologia para Avaliação de Experiência do Usuário em Periódicos Científicos", p. 5209-5221. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE PESQUISA E DESENVOLVIMENTO EM DESIGN, 13., 2018, Joinville. Anais [...]. São Paulo: Blucher, 2019, DOI 10.5151/ped2018-7

Resumo

Este artigo apresenta o desenvolvimento de metodologia para verificação da experiência do usuário de periódicos científicos com foco no design visual da interface. O objetivo da pesquisa foi desenvolver um processo de investigação que auxiliasse na compreensão de como o design visual afeta a experiência do usuário nesses veículos de comunicação científica. A metodologia da pesquisa é descrita a partir da seleção de métodos de base, da definição de ferramenta para coleta de dados e do planejamento dos procedimentos de aplicação dessa ferramenta. Mediante a metodologia desenvolvida, foi analisada a revista Blake Quarterly, que é publicada no Open Journal System (OJS). Espera-se que os resultados dessa pesquisa contribuam seja para elaboração, seja para qualificação das publicações científicas, favorecendo a comunicação entre os pesquisadores e a divulgação dos resultados de pesquisa.
Palavras-chave:

Design visual, Experiência do usuário, Periódico científico

Abstract

This article presents the development of methodology to verify the user experience of scientific journals focusing on the visual design of the interface. The aim of this research was to develop a research process that would aid in understanding how visual design affects the user experience in these scientific communication vehicles. The methodology of the research is described from the selection of basic methods, the definition of a tool for data collection and the planning of the application procedures of this tool. Through the methodology developed, we analyzed the journal Blake Quarterly, which has been published in the Open Journal System (OJS). It is hoped that the results of this research contribute to both the elaboration and qualification of scientific publications, favoring communication between researchers and the dissemination of research results.
Keywords:

Visual design, User experience, Scientific journal

Referências bibliográficas

  • ISBISTER, K.; HÖÖK, K.; SAHRP, M.; LAAKOLAHTI, J. The sensual evaluation instrument: developing an affective evaluation tool. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. p. 1163-1172. ACM, 2006.

  • IZARD, C. E. Basic Emotions, Relations Among Emotions, and Emotion-Cognition Relations. Psychological Review, v. 99, n. 3, p. 561-565, 1992.

  • JORDAN, P. W. Designing pleasurable products: An introduction to the new human factors. CRC press, 2002.

  • KIRAKOWSKI, J.; CORBETT, M.. SUMI: The software usability measurement inventory. British journal of educational technology, v. 24, n. 3, p. 210-212, 1993.

  • KIRSCHNER, P. A.; KIRSCHNER, F. Mental effort. In: N. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning, Volume 5 (pp. 2182-2184). New York, NY: Springer. 2012.

  • KORT, Joke; VERMEEREN, A. P. O. S.; FOKKER, Jenneke E. Conceptualizing and measuring user experience. In: Proc. Towards a UX Manifesto, COST294-MAUSE affiliated workshop. p. 57-64. 2007.

  • LAUGWITZ, B.; SCHREPP, M.; HELD, T. Konstruktion eines Fragebogens zur Messung der User Experience von Softwareprodukten. In: Mensch & Computer. p. 125-134. 2006.

  • LAUGWITZ, B.; HELD, T.; SCHREPP, M. Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. In: Symposium of the Austrian HCI and Usability Engineering Group. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, p. 63-76. 2008.

  • MADSEN, M.; GREGOR, S. Measuring human-computer trust. In: 11th australasian conference on information systems. p. 6-8. 2000.

  • MANDRYK, R. L.; INKPEN, K. M.; CALVERT, T. W. Using psychophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies. In: Behaviour & information technology, v. 25, n. 2, p. 141-158, 2006.

  • MASON, J. Qualitative researching. Sage, 2002.

  • MCDONAGH, D.; HEKKERT, P.; VAN ERP, J.; GYI, D. Design and emotion. CRC Press, 2003.

  • MEHRABIAN, A.; RUSSELL, J. A. An approach to environmental psychology. the MIT Press, 1974.

  • PAZMINO, A. V. Como se cria: 40 métodos para o design de produtos. São Paulo: Ed. Blucher, 2015.

  • PÉREZ COTA, M., THAMASCHEWKI, J., SCHREPP, M.; GONCALVES, R. Efficient measurement of the user experience. A Portuguese version. Procedia Computer Science, v. 27, p. 491-498, 2014.

  • ROTO, V.; LAW, E.; VERMEEREN, A.; HOONHOLT, J. User Experience White Paper. Bringing clarity to the concept of user experience. Result from Dagstuhl Seminar on Demarcating User Experience, September 15-18, 2010 February 11, 2011. Disponível em: http://www.allaboutux.org/. Acesso em: 5 jul. 2015.

  • RUSSELL, J.; WEISS, A.; Mendelsohn, G. Affect Grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 57, n. 3, p. 493-502, 1989.

  • RYAN, R. M. Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of personality and social psychology, v. 43, n. 3, p. 450, 1982.

  • SACHARIN, V.; SCHLEGEL, K.; SCHERER, K. R. Geneva Emotion Wheel rating study (Report). Geneva, Switzerland: University of Geneva. Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, 2012.

  • SCHREPP, M.; COTA, M. P.; GONÇALVES, R.; HINDERKS, A.; THOMASCHEWSKI, J. Adaption of user experience questionnaires for different user groups. Universal Access in the Information Society, p. 1-12. 2016.

  • SCHREPP, M. User Experience Questionnaire Handbook. All you need to know to apply the UEQ successfully in your projects. 2017. Disponível em: http://www.ueq-online.org/. Acesso em jan. 2018.

  • SCHERER, K. R. Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research, v. 92, p. 120, 2001.

  • STÄHL, A.; HÖÖK, K.; SVENSSON, M.; TAYLOR, A. S.; COMBETTO, M. Experiencing the Affective Diary. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, v. 13, n. 5, p. 365-378, 2009.

  • SULLIVAN, G.; SILVERMAN, D. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. 2003.

  • VAN BOXTEL, A. Facial EMG as a tool for inferring affective states. In: Proceedings of measuring behavior. Wageningen: Noldus Information Technology, 2010. p. 104-108.

  • VENKATESH, V.; MORRIS, M. G.; DAVIS, G. B.; DAVIS, F. D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, p. 425-478, 2003.

  • VERMEEREN, A.P.O.S.; LAW, E.L.; ROTO, V.; OBRIST, M.; HOONHOUT, J.; VÄÄNÃNEN-VAINIO-MATTILA, K. User experience evaluation methods: current state and development needs. In: Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries. ACM, p. 521-530. 2010.

  • VON WILAMOWITZ-MOELLENDORFF, M.; HASSENZAHL, M.; PLATZ, A. Dynamics of user experience: How the perceived quality of mobile phones changes over time. 2006.

  • VOSS, K. E.; SPANGENBERG, E. R.; GROHMANN, B. Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of marketing research, v. 40, n. 3, p. 310-320, 2003.

  • WARD, R. D.; MARSDEN, P. H. Physiological responses to different web page designs. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v. 59, n. 1, p. 199-212, 2003.

  • ZAMAN, B. Introducing contextual laddering to evaluate the likeability of games with children. Cognition, Technology & Work, v. 10, n. 2, p. 107-117, 2008.