Memória P&D Design

14º Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design

ESDI/UERJ; ESPM-Rio — Rio de Janeiro (RJ)

Outubro/2022

Colaboração Interdisciplinar no Biodesign: Obstáculos e Facilitadores

Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Biodesign: Obstacles and Enablers

Andrea Bandoni
Gabriela Frossard

Como citar

Bandoni, Andrea; Frossard, Gabriela; "Colaboração Interdisciplinar no Biodesign: Obstáculos e Facilitadores", p. 6273-6284. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE PESQUISA E DESENVOLVIMENTO EM DESIGN, 14., 2022, Rio de Janeiro. Anais [...]. São Paulo: Blucher, 2022, DOI 10.5151/ped2022-6664644

Resumo

Uma colaboração direta entre cientistas e designers acontece com frequência no Biodesign, área do design que, integrando preocupações ecológicas, trabalha ou aprende com processos orgânicos encontrados em sistemas vivos. Neste estudo foram realizadas entrevistas com biodesigners da América do Sul e Europa, visando compreender como se dá a parceria entre estes profissionais e os cientistas em suas atividades. As informações dos entrevistados foram sintetizadas e comparadas, e foi feita uma análise temática para identificar e refletir sobre os métodos dos designers, além de destacar barreiras e facilitadores da colaboração interdisciplinar, os quais podem ser estendidos a outros contextos de parceria. O estudo também indica os frutos destas colaborações, bem como sua relevância para os campos do design e da ciência. Além do esperado impacto da ciência no design, foi constatada a influência que designers estão alcançando dentro de domínios científicos, seja como colaboradores ou líderes de projetos.
Palavras-chave:

Biodesign, Ciências, Colaboração Interdisciplinar

Abstract

A direct collaboration between scientists and designers often takes place in Biodesign, an area of design that addresses ecological concerns by working with or learning from organic processes found in living systems. In this study, interviews were conducted with biodesigners from South America and Europe, understanding how the partnership between these professionals and scientists happens in their activities. The information from the interviewees was synthesized and compared, and a thematic analysis was carried with the aim of identifying and reflecting on the designers' methods, and also highlighting interdisciplinary collaboration's barriers and facilitators, which can be extended to other partnership contexts. The study also indicates the fruits of these collaborations as well as their relevance to the fields of design and science. Besides the expected impact of science in design, the study verified the influence that designers, whether as collaborators or project leaders, are achieving within scientific domains.
Keywords:

Biodesign, Science, Interdisciplinary Collaboration

Referências bibliográficas

  • BRAUN, V; CLARKE, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, [S. l.], v. 3, n. 2, 2006. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

  • CHO, T. Getting Started. In: MYERS, W. Biodesign: Nature, Science, Creativity. London: Thames & Hudson, 2018. p.266-268.

  • COLLET, C. New MA Biodesign at Central Saint Martins UAL | LinkedIn. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/new-ma-biodesign-central-saint-martins-ual-carole-collet/. Acesso em: 25 set. 2021.

  • COYNE, R.; SNODGRASS, A. Is Designing Hermeneutical? Journal of the Department of Architecture, The University of Sydney, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 65–97, 1997.

  • DRIVER, A. J.; PERALTA, C.; MOULTRIE, J. Exploring how industrial designers can contribute to scientific research. International Journal of Design, [S. l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 17–28, 2011. Disponível em: http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/834/326. Acesso em: 28 set. 2021.

  • GINSBERG, A.; CHIEZA, N. Editorial: Other Biological Futures. Journal of Design and Science, [S. l.], 2018. DOI: 10.21428/566868b5. Disponível em: https://jods.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/issue4-ginsberg-chieza. Acesso em: 27 set. 2021.

  • ITO, J. Design and Science. Journal of Design and Science, [S. l.], 2016. DOI: 10.21428/f4c68887. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.21428/f4c68887. Acesso em: 27 set. 2021.

  • KÄÄRIÄINEN, P.; TERVINEN, L. Lost in the Wood(s): The New Biomateriality in Finland. Helsinki: Aalto University, 2017.

  • KÄÄRIÄINEN, P.; TERVINEN, L.; VUORINEN, T.; RIUTTA, N. Chemarts Cookbook. Helsinki: Aalto University, 2020.

  • KARANA, E.; BARATI, B.; GIACCARDI, E. Living artefacts: Conceptualizing livingness as a material quality in everyday artefacts. International Journal of Design, [S. l.], v. 14, n. 3, p. 37–53, 2020.

  • MYERS, W. Biodesign: Nature, Science, Creativity. London: Thames & Hudson, 2018.

  • PERALTA, C. Collaborative Material Research: Designers and scientists Working with Materials Development. In: KÄÄRIÄINEN, P.; TERVINEN, L. (org.). Lost in the Wood(s): The New Biomateriality in Finland. Helsinki: Aalto University, 2017. v. 1p. 48–55.

  • PERALTA, C. A Case Study of Designers and Scientists Collaborating in Materials Research. In: KAARIAINEN, P.; KATAJA, K. (org.). Designing Cellulose for the future: Design-Driven Value Chains In The World of Celullose. Helsinki: Aalto University, 2018. p. 23–24.

  • REKONEN, S. Unlocking the potential of interdisciplinary teams. In: BJÖRKLUND, T.; LAAKSO, M.; KIRJAVAINEN, S.; EKMAN, K. (org.). Passion-based Co-creation. Helsinki: Aalto University, 2017. p. 90–101.

  • RUST, C. Design Enquiry: Tacit Knowledge and Invention in Science. Design Issues, [S. l.], v. 20, n. 4, 2004. DOI: 10.1162/0747936042311959.