12º Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design

UEMG; Una — Belo Horizonte (MG)

Novembro/2016

Fatores Relacionados à Criatividade no Indivíduo, em Grupos e no Contexo: Uma Revisão

Como citar

Zavadil, Priscila; Tschimmel, Katja; Silva, Régio Pierre da; "Fatores Relacionados à Criatividade no Indivíduo, em Grupos e no Contexo: Uma Revisão", p. 193-205. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE PESQUISA E DESENVOLVIMENTO EM DESIGN, 12., 2016, Belo Horizonte. Anais [...]. São Paulo: Blucher, 2016

Resumo

A criatividade projetual é uma capacidade determinante para a geração de ideias e novas soluções, através de um processo cognitivo individual, mas também de um processo de design e criativo que compreende diversos atores trabalhando em conjunto, inseridos em um contexto social. Muitas teorias relatam aspectos relevantes para a criatividade no indivíduo e no contexto em que se insere, algumas trazendo modelos de interações entre esses componentes. Entretanto, diante da diversidade de teorias e de variáveis que podem afetar a criatividade, este artigo visa identificar os principais fatores que influenciam a criatividade e como se relacionam entre o indivíduo e este inserido em grupos de projeto e em determinado contexto ambiental. Para isso, realizou-se uma revisão de literatura sobre os aspectos da criatividade no indivíduo e no contexto ambiental, incluindo abordagens cognitivas e sociais da criatividade. A partir dessa revisão, desenhou-se um modelo teórico com o mapeamento desses principais fatores e suas relações. Com base na literatura, pode-se verificar que a motivação é o elemento-chave que inter-relaciona os demais fatores no indivíduo, grupo e contexto.
Palavras-chave:

indivíduo criativo, criatividade social, design

Abstract

Design creativity is not only a crucial ability to generate ideas and new solutions through an individual cognitive process, but also a design and creative process that can include several participants working together, embedded in a social context. Many theories report features relevant to the creativity of the individual and the context in which it operates, bringing rise to some models of interactions between these components. However, given the diversity of theories and variables that can affect creativity, this paper aims to identify the main factors influencing creativity and how they relate to the individual, and insert this into project groups, and in particular an environmental context. For this, we carried out a literature review on aspects of creativity of the individual and in the wider context, including cognitive and social approaches to creativity. From this review, we drew up a theoretical model with the mapping of these key factors and their relationships. Based on the literature, it can be seen that motivation is the key element that interrelates the other factors in the individual, group and context.
Keywords:

individual creativity, social creativity, design

Referências bibliográficas

  • AGARS, M. D. et al. Fostering individual creativity through organizational context: a review of recent research and recommendations for organizational leaders. In: MUMFORD, M. D. (org). Handbook of Organizational Creativity. San Diego: Academic Press, 2012.

  • ALENCAR, E. M. L. S.; FLEITH, D. S. Criatividade: múltiplas perspectivas. 3 ed. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília, 2003.

  • AMABILE, T. M. Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 45, p.997-1013.

  • AMABILE, T. M. Motivating creativity in organizations: on doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, vol 40, n1, 1997, pp. 38-58.

  • BISSOLA, R. et al. Enhancing the creative performance of new product teams: an organizational configurational approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, n31, v2, 2014, pp. 375-391.

  • CHAKRABARTI, A. Motivation as a Major Direction for Design Creativity Research. In: TAURA, T,; NAGAI, Y (Eds). Design Creativity 2010. London: Springer, 2011, pp. 49-56.

  • CROWE, E.; HIGGINS, E. T. Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision making. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 69 (2), 1998, pp.117–132.

  • CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. Society, culture and person: a systems view of creativity. In: STERNBERG, R. J. (org). The nature of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

  • CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Collings Publishers: Australia, 2007.

  • FEIST, Gregory J.; BARRON, Frank X. Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect, potential, and personality. Journal of research in personality, v. 37, n. 2, p. 62-88, 2003.

  • FORD, Cameron M. A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management review, v. 21, n. 4, p. 1112-1142, 1996.

  • GUILFORD, J. P. The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.

  • GILSON, L. L.; SHALLEY, C. E. A little creativity goes a long way: an examination of team ́s engagement in creative process. Journal of Management, n30, v4, 2004, pp.453-470.

  • HENNESSEY, B. A; AMABILE, T. M. Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 61, pp. 569-598, 2010.

  • HIGGINS, E. T. Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.). Advances in Experimental Psychology, 30, 1998, pp.1–46

  • KLAUSEN, S. H. The notion of creativity revisited: a philosophical perspective on creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 4, 2010, pp.347-360.

  • KLIJN, M.; TOMIC, W. A review of creativity within organizations from a psychological perspective. Journal of Management Development, vol. 29, n 4, 2010, pp.-322-343.

  • KNELLER, G. F. Arte e Ciência da Criatividade. 2 ed. São Paulo: IBRASA, 1978.

  • KOWALTOWSKI, D. C. C. K. et al. A criatividade no processo de projeto. IN: PETRECHE, J. R. D.; FABRÍCIO, M. M. (Org). O Processo de Projeto em Arquitetura. São Paulo: Oficina de Textos, 2011.

  • KRÖPPER, M. et al. Interrelations between Motivation, Creativity and Emotions in Design Thinking Processes. In: TAURA, T,; NAGAI, Y (Eds). Design Creativity 2010. London: Springer, 2011, pp. 97-104.

  • LUBART, T. Psicologia da Criatividade. Porto Alegre: Grupo A. 2007.

  • MACKINNON, D. W. Personality and the realism of the creative potential. American Psychologist, 20, 1965, pp. 273-281.

  • MARÍN IBAÑEZ, R.; DE LA TORRE, S. Manual de la creatividad: aplicaciones educativas. Barcelona: Vicens Vives, 1991.

  • MUMFORD, M. S. et al. Tradeoffs between ideas and structure: individual versus group performance in creative problem solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, v.35, n.1., 2001, pp. 1-23.

  • NEUMAN, A. et al. A framework for measuring team mental models in design. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Design Conference, Croatia, 2006, pp.1491-1498.

  • SARKAR, P.; CHAKRABARTI, A. The effect of representation of triggers on design outcomes. Artificial Intelligence for Engineerign Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 22, 2008, pp.101-116

  • SAUNDERS, R.; Gero J.S. Artificial creativity: A synthetic approach to the study of creative behaviour. In: GERO, J.S.; MAHER, M.L. (Ed). Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Design, Vol.V. Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, 2001, pp. 113–139.

  • SHALLEY, C. E. et al. The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: where should we go from here? Journal of Management, n30, v6, 2004, pp. 933-958.

  • STERNBERG, R.J. A three-facet model creativity. In: STERNBERG, R.J (Org.), The nature of creativity. Contemporary psychological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

  • STERNBERG, R. J. Psicologia Cognitiva. São Paulo: Cengage Learning, 2012.

  • STERNBERG. R.J.; LUBART, T.I. An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34, 1991, pp. 1-31.

  • STERNBERG. R.J.; LUBART, T.I. Defying the crowd. Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York, The Free Press, 1995.

  • TAGGAR, S. Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, v. 45, n. 2, pp. 315-330, 2002.

  • TSCHIMMEL, K. C. Sapiens e Demens no pensamento criativo do design. Tese (Doutorado em Design) – Universidade de Aveiro, Departamento de Comunicação e Arte, Aveiro, 2010.

  • WOODMAN, R. W.; SAWYER, J. E.; GRIFFIN, R. W. Toward a theory of Organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 1993, Vol. 18, No, 2, pp. 293-321.