Memória P&D Design

13º Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design

Univille — Joinville (SC)

Novembro/2018

Design para Mudança de Comportamento: Uma Revisão Sistemática nas Conferências da Design Research Society (DRS)

Design for Behavior Change: A Systematic Review At Design Research Society (DRS) Conferences

Henrique Bittencourt Almeida
Celso Carnos Scaletsky

Como citar

Almeida, Henrique Bittencourt; Scaletsky, Celso Carnos; "Design para Mudança de Comportamento: Uma Revisão Sistemática nas Conferências da Design Research Society (DRS)", p. 2128-2139. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE PESQUISA E DESENVOLVIMENTO EM DESIGN, 13., 2018, Joinville. Anais [...]. São Paulo: Blucher, 2019, DOI 10.5151/ped2018-3

Resumo

O design para mudança de comportamento (DfBC) é uma abordagem que busca mudar o comportamento das pessoas, através de estratégias de design. O presente estudo procura identificar o que já foi publicado sobre o design para mudança de comportamento nas conferências da Design Research Society (DRS), com o intuito de fortalecer e contribuir com a estruturação teórica do campo. Como método de pesquisa, foi feita uma revisão sistemática em artigos publicados nas conferências de 2010 a 2016 do evento. A partir dessa revisão sistemática identificou-se algumas lacunas, onde futuras pesquisa sobre o design para mudança de comportamento, podem explorar a relação entre designers e os atores envolvidos no processo de projeto. Outra possibilidade que se revela, é a de desenvolver novos métodos projetuais que auxiliem designers a projetarem de maneira mais efetiva para a mudança de comportamento.
Palavras-chave:

design para mudança de comportamento, revisão sistemática, mudança de comportamento, design research society

Abstract

Design for behavior change (DfBC) is an approach that seeks to change people's behavior through design strategies. This study seeks to identify what has already been published about design for behavior change at Design Research Society (DRS) conferences, in order to strengthen and contribute to the theoretical structuring of the field. As a method of analysis, the systematic review was used in articles published in the conferences from 2010 to 2016. From this systematic review has identified some gaps, where future research on design for behavior change can observe, as the relationship between designers and the actors involved in the design process. Another possibility that has emerged throughout the review is that there are still many possibilities for researching and developing new design methods that will help designers to create methods more effectively for behavior change.
Keywords:

design for behavior change, systematic review, behavior change, design research society

Referências bibliográficas

  • BOKS, C. Design for Sustainable Behaviour Research Challenges. Proceedings of EcoDesign 2011 International Symposium, p. 328-333, 2011.

  • CASH, P. J.; GRAM, C. H.; BOYSEN, C. D. Behavioural design: A process for integrating behaviour change and design. Design Studies, v.48, p. 96-128, 2017.

  • CLUNE, S. Design for Behavioral Change. The Journal of Design strategies, v.4, n. 1, p. 68-75, 2010.

  • COSKUN, A.; ERBURG, C. Exploring and communicating user diversity for behavioural change. In: PROCEEDINGS OF DRS, 2016, Brighton, UK. v. 4, p. 1357-1374, 2016.

  • COSKUN, A.; ERBURG, C. User diversity in design for behavior change. In: PROCEEDINGS OF DRS, 2014, Umea, Sweden. v. 1, p. 546-559, 2014.

  • MACARTHUR, Foundation. Towards the Circular Economy. The Ellen MacArthur Foundation Report, p. 26, 2013.

  • ESSEN, V.; HERMSEN, S.; RENES, R. Developing a theory-driven method to design for behaviour change: two case studies. In: PROCEEDINGS OF DRS, 2016, Brighton, UK. v. 4, p. 1323-1337, 2016.

  • FLUSSER, V. O mundo codificado. Por uma Filosofia do design e da comunicação (1ª ed.) São Paulo: Cosac Naify, 2007.

  • FOGG, B. J. A Behavior Model for Persuasive Design. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on persuasive technology, 2009, Claremont (CA). Anais..., Claremont (CA), ACM, 2009. Art. 40.

  • HERMSEN, S., VAN DER LUGT., MULDER, S., RENES, R. J. How I learned to appreciate our tame social scientist: experiences in integrating design research and the behavioural sciences. in: P. Lloyd & E. Bohemia, eds., Proceedings of DRS2016: Design + Research + Society – Future-Focused Thinking, v. 4, p. 1375-1389, 2016.

  • JELSMA, J. Designing 'Moralized' Products: Theory and Practice. In: VERBEEK, P. P.; SLOB, A. (Eds.). User Behavior and Technology Development: Shaping Sustainable Relations Between Consumers and Technologies. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, p. 221-231, 2006.

  • JOHN, N. Communication design as an agent in creating gender equality in India. In: PROCEEDINGS OF DRS, 2014, Umea, Sweden. v. 1, p. 530-545, 2014.

  • KRIPPENDORFF, K. The semantic turn. A new foundation for design. Boca-Raton: Taylor & Francis, 2006.

  • LILLEY, D.; LOFTHOUSE, V. Teaching Ethics For Design For Sustainable Behaviour: A pilot study. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal. v.15, n.2: 55-68, 2009.

  • LOCKTON, D., HARRISON, D., STANTON, N. Design with Intent: 101 Patterns for Influencing Behaviour Through Design. Tradução de Luiz Oliveira. v.1.0, Windsor: Equifine, 2010a.

  • LOCKTON, D.; HARRISON, D.; STANTON, N. Exploring Design Patterns for Sustainable Behaviour. The Design Journal, London, v.16, n. 4, p. 431-459, 2013.

  • LUDDEN, G.; HEKKERT, P. Design for healthy behavior design interventions and stages of change. Proceedings of the Colors of Care: The 9th International Conference on Design & Emotion. Ediciones Uniandes, Bogotá, p. 482-488, 2014.

  • LUDDEN, G.; RUIJTER, L. Supporting healthy behaviour: A stages of change perspective on changing snacking habits of children. In: PROCEEDINGS OF DRS, 2016, Brighton, UK. v. 4, p. 1474-1486, 2016.

  • MORANDI, M.; CAMARGO, L. (2014). Revisão Sistemática da Literatura. Design Science Research: método de pesquisa para avanço da ciência e tecnologia. RS, 1º edição, Editora Bookman, pag. 141-172.

  • NIEDDERER, K. et al. Creating Sustainable Innovation through Design for Behaviour Change: Full Project Report. Leicestershire, UK: Project Partners & AHRC, 2014.

  • NIEDDERER, K. Mindful Design as a Driver for Social Behaviour Change. Consilence and Innovation in Design - Proceedings and Program, 2013.

  • NIEDDERER, K., MACKRILL, J., CLUNE, S., LOCKTON, D., LUDDEN, G., MORRIS, A., CAIN, R., GARDINER, E., GUTTERIDGE, R., EVANS, M., HEKKERT, P. Creating Sustainable Innovation through Design for Behaviour Change: Full Report. University of Wolverhampton, Project Partners & AHRC, 2014.

  • PISCICELLI, L.; LUDDEN, G. The potential of Design for Behaviour Change to foster the transition to a circular economy. In: PROCEEDINGS OF DRS, 2016, Brighton, UK. v. 4, p. 1306-1321, 2016.

  • SELVEFORS, A.; STROMBERG, H.; RENSTROM, S. What a designer can change: a proposal for a categorisation of artefact-related aspects. In: PROCEEDINGS OF DRS, 2016, Brighton, UK. v. 4, p. 1340-1355, 2016.

  • STANTON, N. A.; BABER, C. Designing for consumers: editorial. Applied Ergonomics, v.29, no. 1, p. 1-3, 1998.

  • SUNG, K.; COOPER, T.; KETTLEY, S. An alternative approach to influencing behaviour: Adapting Darnton's Nine Principles framework for scaling up individual upcycling. In: PROCEEDINGS OF DRS, 2016, Brighton, UK. v. 4, p. 1277-1290, 2016.

  • TRANFIELD, D; DENYER, D; SMART, P. Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, v. 14, p.207–222, 200. KHAN et al. Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the royal society of medicine, v. 96, p.118-121, 2003.

  • TROMP, N.; HEKKERT, P. Social Implication Design (SID) – A Design Method to Exploit the Unique Value of the Artifact to Counteract Social Problems. In: PROCEEDINGS OF DRS, 2014, Umea, Sweden. v. 1, p. 584-598, 2014.

  • WENDEL, S. Designing for Behavior Change. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2014.