Memória P&D Design

11º Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design

UFRGS; Unisinos; Uniritter — Gramado (RS)

Outubro/2014

Desenvolvimento de Cenários para Avaliação de Avisos de Segurança em Ambientes Virtuais

Reginaldo Schiavini

Como citar

Schiavini, Reginaldo; "Desenvolvimento de Cenários para Avaliação de Avisos de Segurança em Ambientes Virtuais", p. 1680-1691. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE PESQUISA E DESENVOLVIMENTO EM DESIGN, 11., 2014, Gramado. Anais [...]. São Paulo: Blucher, 2014

Resumo

O objetivo deste estudo é apresentar a metodologia utilizada para desenvolver dois cenários a partir de um ambiente virtual. Foram utilizadas e adaptadas imagens provenientes deste ambiente virtual e retiradas da internet, bem como abordados os conceitos de realidade virtual, avisos e imersão. A importância do uso de cenários em estudos sobre comportamento consonante com avisos é muito grande, sobre tudo quando se precisa modelar/selecionar envolvimentos virtuais. Tais cenários podem apoiar o raciocínio sobre situações de uso, antes mesmo destas situações serem criadas. O resultado obtido com esta metodologia foi o desenvolvimento de dois cenários diferentes: altruísta e egoísta, que apresentam características diferentes e que podem implicar em comportamentos divergentes ao usuário. O desenvolvimento destes dois cenários consistiu uma etapa inicial de uma pesquisa que pretende comparar os dois cenários para saber qual deles poderá exercer uma influência maior sobre o usuário frente a uma tomada de decisão.
Palavras-chave:

Cenário, Aviso, Imersão, Realidade Virtual, Multimodal

Abstract

The objective of this study is to present the methodology used to develop two scenarios from a virtual environment. Were used and adapted images from this virtual environment and taken from the Internet, as well as discussed the concepts of virtual reality, warnings, and immersion. The importance of using scenarios in line with studies on warnings behavior is very large, especially when you need to model/select virtual involvements. Such scenarios can support reasoning about situations of use, even before these situations are created. The results obtained with this approach were the development of two different scenarios: unselfish and selfish, which have different characteristics and may involve different user behaviors. The development of these two scenarios consisted of an initial step of a research that aims to compare the two scenarios to see which of them can exert greater influence on the user facing a decision.
Keywords:

Scenario, Warning, Imersion, Virtual Reality, Multimodal

Referências bibliográficas

  • ALEXANDER, Ian; MAIDEN, Neil. Scenarios, stories, use cases: through the systems development life-cycle. West Sussex: J. Wiley, 2004.

  • BAÑOS, R.M. et. al. Immersion and emotion: their impact on the sense of presence. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, v.7, nº 6, p.734-741, 2004.

  • BURDEA, Grigore; COIFFET, Philippe. Virtual reality technology. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley, 2003.

  • CARROLL, John Millar. Making use: scenario-based design of human-computer interactions. USA: MIT Press Cambridge, 2000.

  • COOK, Malcolm et. al. Decision making in complex environments. USA: Ashgate, 2007.

  • DAVISON, Phillips. The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, v.47, nº 1, p. 3-15, 1983.

  • DUARTE, Emilia et. al. Behavioral compliance for dynamic versus static signs in an immersive virtual environment. Applied Ergonomics, p.1-9, Nov. 2013.

  • FELTOVICH, Paul, J. et. al. Learners’ (mis)understanding of important and difficult concepts: a challenge to smart machines in education. In: Forbus, Kenneth D.; Feltovich, Paul, J. (ed.). Smart machines in education. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI/MIT Press, 2001.

  • GORINI, Alessandra et. al. The role of immersion and narrative in mediated presence: the virtual hospital experience. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, v.14, nº 3, p. 99-105, 2011.

  • GORINI, Alessandra; GAGGIOLI, Andrea; RIVA, Giuseppe. Virtual reality as an experiential tool: the role of virtual worlds in psychological interventions. In: MOHAMMED, Sabah; FIAIDHI, Jinan (ed.). Ubiquitous health and medical informatics: the ubiquity 2.0 trend and beyond. New York: Medical Information Science Reference, p. 532–551, 2010.

  • GORINI, Alessandra; RIVA, Giuseppe. Virtual reality in anxiety disorders: the past and the future. Expert Reviews Neurotherapeutics, v.8, nº 2, p. 215-233, Fev. 2008.

  • GUTIERREZ, Mario; VEXO, Frederik; THALMANN, Daniel. Stepping into Virtual Reality. Santa Clara, CA: Springer-Verlag Telos, 2008.

  • LAUGHERY, Kenneth R.; SMITH, Danielle P. Explicit information in warnings. In: WOGALTER, Michael S. (ed.). Handbook of warnings. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum, p. 419-428, 2006.

  • LAUGHERY, Kenneth R.; WOGALTER, Michael S. Warnings and risk perception. In: SALVENDY, Gavriel (ed.). Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley, p. 1174-1197, 1997.

  • LOMBARD, Matthew; DITTON, Theresa. At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, v.3, nº 2, 0, Set. 1997.

  • PARK, Sun-A.; KIM, Jeesun. Social categorization and cross-cultural exploration of the third-person effect: perceived impact of North Korea’s nuclear test on the self and comparison targets. Studies in Communication Sciences, v.13, nº 1, p. 50-57, Apr. 2013.

  • PITESA, Marko; THAU, Stefan; PILLUTLA, Madan M. Cognitive control and socially desirable behavior: the role of interpersonal impact. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, v.122, nº2, p. 232-243, Nov. 2013.

  • RIVA, Giuseppe. The Psychology of Ambient Intelligence: Activity, Situation and Presence. In: RIVA, Giuseppe et. al. (ed.). Ambient Intelligence. Amsterdam: IOS Press, p. 17-33, Jan. 2005.

  • RIVA, Giuseppe. Presence as cognitive process. In: BENYON, David; SMYTH, Michael; HELGASON, Ingi. (ed.). Presence for everyone: a short guide to presence research. Edinburg: Centre for Interaction Design Edinburgh Napier University, p.29-31, 2009.

  • WOGALTER, Michael S.; CONZOLA, Vincent C. Using technology to facilitate the design and delivery of warnings. International Journal of Systems Science, v.33, p. 461-466, Nov. 2002.

  • WOGALTER, Michael S.; MAYHORN, Christopher B. Providing cognitive support with technology-based warning systems. Ergonomics, v. 48, nº 5, p. 522-533, Apr. 2005.