Memória P&D Design

13º Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design

Univille — Joinville (SC)

Novembro/2018

Design Colaborativo e Customização em Massa: Uma Interseção de Conceitos Através da Revisão Bibliográfica Sistemática

Collaborative Design and Mass Customization: An Intersection of Concepts Through a Systematic Bibliographic Review

Isabela Mantovani Fontana
Adriano Heemann

Como citar

Fontana, Isabela Mantovani; Heemann, Adriano; "Design Colaborativo e Customização em Massa: Uma Interseção de Conceitos Através da Revisão Bibliográfica Sistemática", p. 1597-1611. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE PESQUISA E DESENVOLVIMENTO EM DESIGN, 13., 2018, Joinville. Anais [...]. São Paulo: Blucher, 2019, DOI 10.5151/ped2018-3

Resumo

Com o intuito de tornar a pesquisa sobre a colaboração no design de produtos para a customização em massa (CM) mais abrangente, o presente artigo insere á uma análise anterior sobre esses conceitos, uma nova análise dos conceitos específicos isolados de design colaborativo e da CM na tentativa de identificar uma possível intersecção entre os dois assuntos e incluindo a literatura consolidada sobre esses conceitos em separado, que não foram identificadas na busca dos termos em conjunto. Para tanto, o procedimento executado foi uma revisão bibliográfica sistemática (RBS), que resultou em um quadro teórico de síntese que classifica a interseção entre os assuntos desta pesquisa. Com esse quadro é possível identificar lacunas e ênfases que as publicações descrevem em suas pesquisas. Isto torna possível listá-las e usá-las como fatores que merecem maior atenção no processo de design de produto para CM.
Palavras-chave:

design colaborativo, customização em massa, desenvolvimento de produto, revisão bibliográfica sistemática

Abstract

In order to make the research about collaborative product design for mass customization (MC) more comprehensive, this article introduces an earlier analysis of these concepts, the analysis of specific isolated concepts of collaborative design and CM in attempt to identify a possible intersection between the two subjects and including the consolidated literature on these separate concepts that were not identified in the search for the terms together. For this, the procedure performed was a systematic literature review, which resulted in a theoretical framework of synthesis. With this framework it is possible to identify gaps and emphases that the publications describe in their research. This makes it possible to list them and use them as factors that deserve more attention in the product design process for CM.
Keywords:

collaborative design, mass customization, product development, systematic literature review

Referências bibliográficas

  • SKELLERN, K.; MARKEY, R.; THORNTHWAITE, L. Identifying attributes of sustainable transitions for traditional regional manufacturing industry sectors – A conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 140, Part 3, p. 1782-1793, 1/1/ 2017.

  • SCHUH, G. et al. Highly Iterative Product Development Within The Tool and Die Making Industry. Procedia CIRP, v. 61, p. 576-581, // 2017.

  • SCUOTTO, V. et al. The performance implications of leveraging internal innovation through social media networks: An empirical verification of the smart fashion industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 120, p. 184-194, 7// 2017.

  • SHI, V. G. et al. Using gamification to transform the adoption of servitization. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 63, p. 82-91, 5// 2017.

  • SONG, W.; SAKAO, T. A customization-oriented framework for design of sustainable product/service system. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 140, Part 3, p. 1672-1685, 1/1/ 2017.

  • SPRING, M. et al. Creating the competitive edge: A new relationship between operations management and industrial policy. Journal of Operations Management, v. 49–51, p. 6-19, 3// 2017.

  • STEFAN, I.; BENGTSSON, L. Unravelling appropriability mechanisms and openness depth effects on firm performance across stages in the innovation process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 120, p. 252-260, 7// 2017.

  • STEIMER, C.; FISCHER, J.; AURICH, J. C. Model-based Design Process for the Early Phases of Manufacturing System Planning using SysML. Procedia CIRP, v. 60, p. 163-168, // 2017.

  • STORY, V. M. et al. Capabilities for advanced services: A multi-actor perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 60, p. 54-68, 1// 2017.

  • SUH, T. et al. Enhancing the simultaneous utilization of measure in product design for academic-practitioner collaboration. Journal of Product and Brand Management, v. 26, n. 3, p. 312-326, 2017.

  • SUN, J. et al. Modularization of Product Service System Based on Functional Requirement. Procedia CIRP, v. 64, p. 301-305, // 2017.

  • TAN, C. et al. Product personalization enabled by assembly architecture and cyber physical systems. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 2017.

  • TELFER, S. et al. Virtually optimized insoles for offloading the diabetic foot: A randomized crossover study. Journal of Biomechanics, 2017.

  • TILINDIS, J.; KLEIZA, V. Learning curve parameter estimation beyond traditional statistics. Applied Mathematical Modelling, v. 45, p. 768-783, 5// 2017.

  • TROTT, P.; SIMMS, C. An examination of product innovation in low- and medium-technology industries: Cases from the UK packaged food sector. Research Policy, v. 46, n. 3, p. 605-623, 4// 2017.

  • ÜLKÜ, M. A.; HSUAN, J. Towards sustainable consumption and production: Competitive pricing of modular products for green consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 142, p. 4230-4242, 2017.

  • VANDERROOST, M. et al. The digitization of a food package's life cycle: Existing and emerging computer systems in the pre-logistics phase. Computers in Industry, v. 87, p. 1-14, 5// 2017.

  • VOGEL-HEUSER, B. et al. Modularity and architecture of PLC-based software for automated production Systems: An analysis in industrial companies. Journal of Systems and Software, v. 131, p. 35-62, 9// 2017.

  • WANG, Y.; YU, S.; XU, T. A user requirement driven framework for collaborative design knowledge management. Advanced Engineering Informatics, v. 33, p. 16-28, 2017.

  • WEI, W. et al. Product Family Flexible Design Method Based on Dynamic Requirements Uncertainty Analysis. Procedia CIRP, v. 60, p. 332-337, // 2017.

  • WIESNER, S.; NILSSON, S.; THOBEN, K.-D. Integrating Requirements Engineering for Different Domains in System Development – Lessons Learnt from Industrial SME Cases. Procedia CIRP, v. 64, p. 351-356, // 2017.

  • WIKNER, J. et al. IOBPCS based models and decoupling thinking. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017.

  • YAN, T.; AZADEGAN, A. Comparing inter-organizational new product development strategies: Buy or ally; Supply-chain or non-supply-chain partners? International Journal of Production Economics, v. 183, p. 21-38, 2017.

  • MOON, S. K.; BI, G. Multidisciplinary design optimization to identify additive manufacturing resources in customized product development. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, v. 4, n. 2, p. 131-142, 4// 2017.

  • ZHANG, J.-L.; ZHANG, Z.; HAN, Y. Research on manufacturability optimization of discrete products with 3D printing involved and lot-size considered. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, v. 43, Part 1, p. 150-159, 4// 2017.

  • ZHANG, M. et al. Linking supply chain quality integration with mass customization and product modularity. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017.

  • ZHANG, Y.; WANG, L.; GAO, J. Supplier collaboration and speed-to-market of new products: the mediating and moderating effects. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, v. 28, n. 3, p. 805-818, 2017.

  • ZHENG, P. et al. Personalized product configuration framework in an adaptable open architecture product platform. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, v. 43, Part 3, p. 422-435, 4// 2017.

  • ZHENG, P. et al. A weighted rough set based fuzzy axiomatic design approach for the selection of AM processes. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, v. 91, n. 5-8, p. 1977-1990, 2017.

  • ZHENG, P. et al. A system framework for OKP product planning in a cloud-based design environment. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, v. 45, p. 73-85, 2017.

  • ZHOU, F. et al. Affective parameter shaping in user experience prospect evaluation based on hierarchical Bayesian estimation. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 78, p. 1-15, 7/15/ 2017.