13º Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design

Univille — Joinville (SC)

Novembro/2018

Abordagem Sistêmica na Caracterização da Participação no Processo de Crowd-design

Systemic Approach in the Characterization of Participation in the Crowd-design Process

Como citar

Dickie, Isadora Burmeister; Schmitz, Mariana; Figueiredo, Luiz Fernando Gonçalves de; Santos dos, Aguinaldo; "Abordagem Sistêmica na Caracterização da Participação no Processo de Crowd-design", p. 1510-1524. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE PESQUISA E DESENVOLVIMENTO EM DESIGN, 13., 2018, Joinville. Anais [...]. São Paulo: Blucher, 2019, DOI 10.5151/ped2018-3

Resumo

Crowd-Design refere-se a uma modalidade emergente de processo desenvolvimento de produtos e serviços que envolve diversos stakeholders em atividades de co-design através de plataformas online. Embora a participação de stakeholders seja intrínseca ao processo de Crowd-Design, ainda faltam estudos que elucidem os níveis de participação envolvidos neste processo. Assim, o objetivo deste artigo é apresentar os resultados de uma pesquisa que buscou compreender, a partir de estudos de casos ex-post-facto, quais são os níveis de participação envolvidos em duas iniciativas de Crowd-Design da plataforma innonatives.com. A Abordagem Sistêmica foi utilizada como ferramenta para analisar e apresentar os resultados. O principal resultado desta pesquisa é, portanto, a caracterização dos processos participativos do processo de Crowd-Design.
Palavras-chave:

processos baseados em multidão, abordagens participativas, processo de desenvolvimento de produto

Abstract

Crowd-Design refers to an emerging model of product and service development process that involves multiple stakeholders in co-design activities through online platforms. Although stakeholder participation is intrinsic to the Crowd-Design process, there is still a lack of studies that elucidate the levels of participation involved in this process. Thus, the purpose of this article is to present the results of a research that sought to understand, from ex-post-facto case studies, what levels of participation are involved in two Crowd-Design initiatives of the innonatives.com platform. The Systemic Approach was used as a tool to analyze and present the results. The main result of this research is, therefore, the characterization of the participatory processes of the Crowd-Design process.
Keywords:

crowd-based processes, participative approaches, product development process

Referências bibliográficas

  • BATISTELLA, C.; NONINO, F. In: Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2012.

  • BRABHAM, D. C. In: Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving: An Introduction and Cases, 2008.

  • BRABHAM, D. C. Moving the crowd at iStockphoto: The composition of the crowd and motivations for participation in a crowdsourced community. In: First Monday, v. 15, n. 3, 2010.

  • BROWN, T. Design Thinking. In: TED, 2009. Disponível em: Acesso em 15 set. 2017.

  • CABEZA, E. U. R.; MOURA, M. OPEN DESIGN: abertura + design = prática projetual para a transformação social. In: Anais do 11º Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design, v. 1, n. 4. São Paulo: Blucher, 2014.

  • CHIU, C. M.; LIANG, T. P.; TURBAN, E. What can crowdsourcing do for decision support? In: Decision Support Systems, v. 65, p. 40–49, 2014.

  • CHOI, J. H.; LEE, J. S. Online social networks for crowdsourced multimedia-involved behavioral testing: An empirical study. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 2015. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01991.

  • DAWSON, R.; BYNGHALL, S. Getting results from crowds. San Francisco: Advanced Human Technologies, 2012.

  • DE TONI, A. J.; BIOTTO, G.; BATISTELLA, C. Organizational design drivers to enable emergent creativity in web-based communities. In: The Learning Organization, v. 19, n. 4, p. 335-349, 2012.

  • DICKIE, I.; SANTOS, A. Bases Para Entendimento Do Crowdsourcing E Sua Aplicação Em Projetos De Crowd-Design. In: Anais do 11º Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design, v. 1, n. 4. São Paulo: Blucher, 2014.

  • DJELASSI, S.; DECOOPMAN, I. Customers' participation in product development through crowdsourcing: Issues and implications. In: Industrial Marketing Management, v. 42, p. 683–692, 2013.

  • ESTELLES-AROLAS, E. A task-based crowdsourcing typology. In: Hansson et al. (Eds.), International Reports on Socio-Informatics (IRSI), Proceedings of the CSCW 2016 – Workshop: Toward a Typology of Participation in Crowdwork, v. 13, n. 1, pp. 57-64, 2016.

  • ESTELLES-AROLAS, E.; GONZALEZ-LADRON-DE-GUEVARA, F. Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. In: Journal of Information Science, v. 38, n. 2, p. 189-200, 2012.

  • FIEDLER-FERRARA, N. Quando o todo é mais sagaz do que a soma de suas partes. In: scientia zudia, São Paulo, v. 3, n. 2, p. 323-37, 2005.

  • GASSMANN, O.; DAIBER, M.; MUHDI, L. Der Crowdsourcing-Prozess. In: GASSMANN, O. (Edt.). Crowdsourcing - Innovationsmanagement mit Schwarmintelligenz. Carl Hanser Verlag München, p. 31-55, 2010.

  • GEIGER, D.; SEEDORF, S.; SCHULZE, T.; NICKERSON, R. C.; SCHADER, M. Managing the Crowd: Towards a Taxonomy of Crowdsourcing Processes. In: AMCIS 2011 Proceedings - All Submissions. Paper 430. 2011.

  • GEIGER, D.; SCHADER, M.. Personalized task recommendation in crowdsourcing information systems — Current state of the art. In: Decision Support Systems, v. 65, p. 3–16, 2014.

  • HOWE, J. The rise of crowdsourcing. In: Wired Magazine. 2006. Available at: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html. Accessed on January 2015.

  • IDEO.org Design Kit. Website. Disponível em: http://www.designkit.org/resources. Acesso em: novembro de 2017.

  • INNONATIVES PLATFORM. Plataforma online. Disponível em: https://www.innonatives.com/. Acesso em: outubro de 2017.

  • KAULIO, M. Customer, consumer and user involvement in product development: A framework and a review of selected methods. In: Total Quality Management, v. 9(1), p. 141–149, 1998.

  • KAZAZIAN, T. Haverá a idade das coisas leves: design e desenvolvimento sustentável. São Paulo: Senac, 2005.

  • KRUCKEN, L. Competências para o design na sociedade contemporânea. In: Design e transversalidade. Belo Horizonte: Santa Clara: Centro de Estudos Teoria, Cultura e Pesquisa em Design, UEMG, 2008. (Cadernos de Estudos Avançado em Design, Caderno 2, v. 1 – jul. 2008), p.23-32.

  • LEGO IDEAS. Plataforma online. Disponível em: https://ideas.lego.com/dashboard. Acesso em: outubro de 2017.

  • MANZINI, E. Design para a inovação social e sustentabilidade: Comunidades criativas, organizações colaborativas e novas redes projetuais. Rio de Janeiro: Epapers, 2008.

  • MANZINI, E. Social innovation and design – Enabling, replicating and synergizing. in: STEBBING, Peter e TISCHNER, Ursula. Changing Paradigms: Designing for a Sustainable Future. Aalto, Finlândia: Aalto University School of Arts, Design and Architecture, 2015.

  • MUKAZE, S.; VELÁSQUEZ, D. C. V. Product Service System: Co-Designing for Social Impact. Thesis (Master of Sustainable Product Service System Innovation) - School of Engineering, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden, 2012.

  • MUNIZ, M. O.; FIGUEIREDO, L. F. Redefinindo o design: por uma abordagem sistêmica. In: Actas de Diseño, 2007.

  • NAKATSU, R. T.; GROSSMAN, E. B.; IACOVOU, C. L. A taxonomy of crowdsourcing based on task complexity. In: Journal of Information Science, v. 40, n. 6, p. 823-834, 2014.

  • NO!SPEC. website. Disponível em: https://www.nospec.com/. Acesso em: outubro de 2017.

  • OPEN IDEO. Plataforma online. Disponível em: https://openideo.com/. Acesso em: outubro de 2017.

  • PENG, Z.; RUOYU, L. On operating mechanisms of crowdsourcing service innovation. In: IEEE, 2011.

  • PRPI'C, J., SHUKLA, P. P., KIETZMANN, J. H., McCARTHY, I. P. How to work a crowd: Developing crowd capital through crowdsourcing. In: Business Horizons, v. 58, n. 1, p. 77-85, 2015.

  • SANDERS, E.; BRANDT, E.; BINDER, T. A Framework for Organizing the Tools and Techniques of Participatory Design. In: PDC 2010. Sydney, Australia.

  • SHARMA, A. Crowdsourcing Critical Success Factor Model Strategies to harness the collective intelligence of the crowd. 2010. Available at: https://irevolution.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/working-paper1.pdf. Accessed on: June 2015.

  • SIMULA, H. VUORI, M. Benefits and barriers of crowdsourcing in B2B firms: generating ideas with internal and external crowds. In: International Journal of Innovation Management, v. 16, n. 6, p. 1-19, 2012.

  • SIMULA, H.; AHOLA, T. A network perspective on idea and innovation crowdsourcing in industrial firms. In: Industrial Marketing Management, v. 43, p. 400-408, 2014.

  • STANOEVSKA-SLABEVA, K. Enabled Innovation: Instruments and Methods of Internet-based Collaborative Innovation. In: 1st Berlin Symposium in Internet and Society, 2011.

  • SuM (SUSTAINABILITY MAKER PROJECT). website. Disponível em: http://sustainabilitymaker.org/. Acesso em: outubro de 2017.

  • THACKARA, J. Plano B: o design e as alternativas viáveis em um mundo complexo. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2008.

  • THUAN, N. H.; ANTUNES, P.; JOHNSTONE, D. Factors influencing the decision to crowdsource: a systematic literature review. In: Inf. Syst. Front, v. 18, p. 47-68, 2016.

  • TISCHNER, U.; BESTE, L. State of the Art of Open Innovation and Design for Sustainability. In: MATSUMOTO et al. (Eds.), Sustainability Through Innovation in Product Life Cycle Design, EcoProduction: 2017.